The announcement last week by Rutgers University that it would require all students to get the COVID vaccine prompted CHD Chairman Robert F. to Rutgers President: COVID Vaccine Mandate Violates Federal Law “We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.” …Citizen Wellsįrom The Defender March 29, 2021. “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” …Joseph Goebbels
Why are we testing vaccines on children who are minimally impacted by the disease?” …Citizen Wells “Why are we vaccinating healthy adults when 81 percent of Covid-19 cases are mild and there is a 99 percent survival rate. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.Mandated covid vaccinations illegal under federal law emergency use authorization and Nuremberg Code, Forced participation in medical experiment, RFK cautions Rutgers University
JFK RELOADED LAW AND ORDER FOR FREE
This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. Laurel Demkovich's reporting for The Spokesman-Review is funded in part by Report for America and by members of the Spokane community. The Court is expected to issue its opinion within three to six months. "We're still feeling the very real effects of it to this day." "I don't think this instance of racism will be forgotten anytime soon," she said. Lujano said leaving the language in the deed would not remove the memory of the racism associated with it. When discussing discrimination, Whitener said, it's usually good to have data and documents to support it. Helen Whitener questioned Lujano on whether removing the language would lead to forgetting the history that goes along with it. "The Legislature has indicated the clear process for which the restrictive covenants can be removed," Grasso said. The old ones should still be kept in an archive. The auditor is simply left to create new documents without the voided provision in a new chain of title, he wrote in his brief. He argued the new law leaves it up to the court to physically strike void provisions in recorded documents.
John Grasso, attorney for Dalton, said the new law still does not give the auditor any expanded power to strike or eliminate the covenant. In the petitioners' brief, May's lawyers argue the new law has confusing language that still does not allow covenants to be eliminated from public record, including the line requiring documents to be preserved for historical or archival purposes.īecause the lower courts failed to allow May to remove the deed and because the language in the new law remains unclear, it is up to the Supreme Court in this case to order the auditor to strike the language. The law goes on to say striking the language should not "prevent preservation of the original record, outside of the chain of title, for historical or archival purposes." The law allows homeowners, if they chose, to pursue a "judicial remedy," which would order a county auditor to entirely strike the "racist or otherwise discriminatory covenants from the chain of title."
JFK RELOADED LAW AND ORDER HOW TO
She pointed to a new law passed by the Legislature in April, which outlines the process of how to remove racial covenants from public records. In Thursday's argument before the Supreme Court, Yajaira Lujano, a Gonzaga University law clinic intern representing May, said the language is "viscerally offensive" and prevents a homeowner from fully enjoying their property. The Spokane County Superior Court and a Washington state appeals court both ruled against May, saying the county does not have the authority to remove the provisions. Homes in Spokane and across the country have similar language in their titles, although it is now illegal to enforce them.
0 kommentar(er)
